An article published today on Forbes reads ” Heelys Shares Rise on Upgrade “
The stock was up yesterday after hours for the cancellation of the 4.5 million shares SEC filing, not after some analyst upgraded it today late morning!!!! What’s wrong with Forbes news reports?
Moreover, I also am not impressed with what Analyst Sujata Shekar from CIBC had to say about the stock. She raised 2007 estimates to $1.79 from $1.49 and introduces a $32 target tag on the stock. That gives Heelys, a company growing very much more than 100%, more than 50% shorted, with a cheap P/E of around 17.5. woooooo What the ‘Analysis’?
My studies and analysis tell my brain that when you upgrade a stock to ’sector outperformer’ from a ’sector performer’…you take into account for default that it’s P/E is going to improve not decrease!!!
But according to ‘Analyst Sujata Shekar’, the stock which was trading on an average P/E of around 18.5, will OUTPERFORM the sector and go down in price valuation ending the year with a P/E of around 17.5.
Does something ring bells in your head? Isn’t something wrong here?
My take on Heelys :
Taking a 25% growth in the next two quarters which every body knows is going to be easily beaten by the company, I value HLYS should be trading currently at 1.31 * 25 = $32.75 . ($1.31 earnings is average of all analysts)
Conversely, I opine they’ll make a minimum $1.8 which puts us at1.8 * 25 = $45, by the year end…and I add $4 for the short covering which should place the stock price around $50 by the year end.
This taking into consideration that they do not throw out new news screwing up the price creating volatility again. If they do that…I decrease the price target by $5. That should put us around $40-$49 a share by year end. A acquisition rumour or a merger news should boost the price then to newer never adventured levels. Heelys gives us the best Profit/Loss ratio to get them into your portfolio.
This is just by taking into consideration that they have a P/E of just 25.
We are increasing our long holding, once the price consolidates.
Comments appreciated.
Good Luck,
Youradu.
June 29, 2007
Posted by
explainstuff |
Blogroll |
|
1 Comment
Wow I love those Heelys. mmmuah.
We are on another trade spree here.
Bought two bunches on this dip.
One small bunch at $27.3
Another bigger bunch today at $ 24.8
We are up 10% after hours from today’s closing price. The shorts will have a hard time in the coming days. That squeeze should take us much higher. Hold on tight and thank Staffaroni.
Congrats and Good Luck.
June 28, 2007
Posted by
explainstuff |
Blogroll, Holding, Profited, Short Term |
|
3 Comments
Wow I love those Heelys. mmmuah.
We are on another trade spree here.
Bought two bunches on this dip.
One small bunch at $27.3
Another bigger bunch today at $ 24.8
We are up 10% after hours from today’s closing price. The shorts will have a hard time in the coming days. That squeeze should take us much higher. Hold on tight and thank Staffaroni.
Congrats and Good Luck.
June 28, 2007
Posted by
explainstuff |
Blogroll |
|
No Comments Yet
We wanted to talk to them on Monday evening if the results were not out by then. But one of our comment’s made us call them today. Thanks and appreciations to srx.
We just talked again to the investor relations at the Environmental Control Corporation.
The answers have been confident and positive again.
Two questions we asked :
1) When are the results of the test supposed to be announced?
Ans) Sir, The result of the test being done was supposed to be out by this week. It can be out any day now. We are waiting on to deliver everybody a good positive news.
2) Why is Michael Mugford, the director of both EVCC and MGM enterprises selling the stock? (We asked this questio long back, and got ‘Personal reasons’ as answer )
Ans) Michael and most other directors have been working with EVCC without any pay. And moreover the number of shares he has sold doesn’t even account up to be a considerable number considering his huge holding in the company. He has been selling for some confidential and personal reasons. Moreover, MGM has just bought a good bunch of the stock. That should indirectly mean he (being a founder of MGM ) has no negative issues with the test, nor the company. Hope I clarified your question.
Srx I hope that clarifies your question tooo. I don’t know whether the test outcome will be positive or negative, but the company sounds confident, positive and the industry is a booming one – remember based in environmental friendly California.
June 22, 2007
Posted by
explainstuff |
Blogroll |
|
No Comments Yet